Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Hillary???

I am pretty disturbed that someone registered a vote for Hillary on my blog. This is disturbing because I know that I have not even advertised this blog to any of my liberal friends. Here is an excerpt from an AP article on Hillary which really highlights her Socialist leanings.

MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) - Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it’s time to replace an “on your own” society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.

The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an “ownership society” really is an “on your own” society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

“I prefer a ‘we’re all in it together’ society,” she said. “I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none.”


Hillary's notion that we should abandon individuality, and become more dependent on the government is scary. “Shared prosperity,” basically means that she’s going to take some of your prosperity and force you to share it with your neighbor, who is not working as hard and is happy to continue in his lazy ways. Competition and free market capitalism is the only way our economy will prosper. The Declaration of Independance mentions the right to "...The pursuit of Happiness." Pursuit being the key word.... That's why I never give money to beggars. In most cases, they are lazy and they realize they can get by without contributing.

The problem with Socialism is that the government which redistributes wealth always has an agenda and eventually gets power-hungry, oppressive, and increasingly currupt. And we know that Hillary is already corrupt.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Isn't she scary!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

maybe it was someone who would prefer not to have obama win the nomination as hillary will be a weaker opponent for micain?

Anonymous said...

good point tanner

JNoble said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
JNoble said...

Because you called me a "spittin' Liberal" to your "army buddies" down in Killeen:

The second you label someone "liberal" or "conservative" you've already missed the point.

Sorry Sykes. Now that you have more people who have differing viewpoints reading your blog you're gonna have to be less biased with your political commentary or I'm gonna have to stop reading this communist literature of yours.